July 31, 2023August 9, 2023 Recent CBCA decision denies claims by Facility Defense Consultants (AI) The recent case involving Facility Defense Consultants, Inc., dba Hanke Constructors and the Department of Veterans Affairs highlights important lessons for federal contractors. The Board of Contract Appeals denied the appeals of Hanke’s modifications to the contract and granted the government’s motion for summary judgment, which resulted in a bilateral modification to the contract. This case emphasizes the importance of careful documentation and communication between contractors and the government, as well as the need for a clear understanding of the terms and conditions of a contract. One of the issues in this case was Hanke’s request for compensation for alleged government-caused delays, “scope creep,” and construction cost increases incurred between 2011 and 2016. The parties executed a “definitized” bilateral modification (Mod 4) in 2017, which contained a provision entitled “Contractor Statement of Release” and stated that it incorporated and attached a “settlement agreement.” The express statement of release, as fully supported by the settlement agreement, resolved these disputes because Hanke accepted compensation while agreeing to forego any additional relief for the items in question and their impact on performance. This case highlights the need for contractors to have knowledgeable legal counsel who can assist them in understanding the terms and conditions of their contracts. It is also crucial for contractors to be familiar with the relevant regulations and laws, as well as to maintain clear and accurate documentation of all communications and transactions with the government. Additionally, contractors should be proactive in identifying and addressing any issues that may arise during the performance of their contracts, and should work closely with the government to ensure that any disputes are resolved in a timely and efficient manner. In conclusion, the Facility Defense Consultants, Inc. dba Hanke Constructors case emphasizes the importance of careful documentation, communication, and compliance with the terms and conditions of federal contracts. By following these best practices, federal contractors can minimize the risk of disputes and ensure that they are able to perform their contracts successfully. This summary was AI generated on 31 July 2023 at Jason Bakke’s request. Share this:TwitterFacebookPrintEmailLinkedInPocketLike this:Like Loading... Related Acquisition Legal cases AIAFABoard of Contract Appealscommunicationcomplianceconstruction cost increasescontract disputescontract modificationsdefinitizationDepartment of Veterans Affairsdocumentationequitable adjustmentsfederal contractorsgovernment-caused delayslegal counselregulationssettlement agreementsummary judgmentterms and conditions